Doctors came across a very interesting case. Although the woman who applied to the doctors with liver problems did not consume alcohol, urine tests were alcohol. It was later revealed that the yeast was fermented in the woman's bladder.
Doctors discovered this disease when they dealt with the
condition of the 61-year-old woman who had a damaged liver and diabetes. In the
woman who applied to the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Presbyterian
Hospital to be added to the liver transplant waiting list, her problems were
thought to be due to alcohol dependence due to urine tests that consistently
showed positive alcohol levels. In fact, in the case report written in February
of this year, there was a statement saying "Our clinicians believe it is
alcohol use disorder".
In addition, while the woman refused to drink alcohol
constantly, the patient did not show any signs of poisoning during her visits
to the clinic, although her urine contained high levels of ethanol. Another
mystery is that there is a large amount of glucose in the urine, with a lot of
yeast that develops. These findings led the researchers to test whether the
yeast in the bladder can produce ethanol from sugar. The team that performed
these tests confirmed high levels of ethanol production and suggested that
these strange results were due to fermented sugars in the bladder.

The yeast in question was defined as Candida glabrata, which
is used in the production of beer and is normally found in the body. Although
this yeast is normally found in the body, its presence in such a large amount
posed a problem. Unfortunately, due to the patient's poor diabetes, the removal
of yeast with antifungal treatment failed. Doctors reported that the woman was
re-evaluating for liver transplant as a result of her treatment failed.
Doctors investigating the case of women encountered some
cases of ethanol production in the urine similar to that, but the cases they
encountered were cases of autopsy and did their work in an experimental
environment other than live. However, people who have previously had this
disease have rarely happened, but they may not have been able to detect it due
to the largely unknown and unusual nature of the pathology.
No comments